Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak Company
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
68 N.J. 1 (1975)
342 A.2d 181
CLIFFORD N. HERBSTMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 29, 1975.
Decided July 1, 1975.
Mr. Edwin K. Large, Jr. argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Large, Scammell & Danziger, attorneys; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, of counsel).
Mr. Clifford N. Herbstman argued the cause pro se.
The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.
Clifford N. Herbstman, a member of the bar of this State who appeared pro se, filed a complaint in the Hunterdon County District Court in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.