Legal Opinion

Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 1, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

68 N.J. 1 (1975)

342 A.2d 181

CLIFFORD N. HERBSTMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 29, 1975.

Decided July 1, 1975.

Mr. Edwin K. Large, Jr. argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Large, Scammell & Danziger, attorneys; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, of counsel).

Mr. Clifford N. Herbstman argued the cause pro se.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

Clifford N. Herbstman, a member of the bar of this State who appeared pro se, filed a complaint in the Hunterdon County District Court in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API