Legal Opinion

State v. Madry

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 18, 1913No. 8421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Ernest Gary and Watts, JJ., Richland, Indictment against A. F. Madry and G. F. Kaigler. Kaigler appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

The defendants were convicted of larceny, but C. F. Kaigler alone appealed.

The following is the agreed statement of facts, upon which the appeal was heard:

“The defendants were found guilty, Judge R. C. Watts presiding; he resigning, Judge Ernest Gary taking his place upon the bench, sentenced the defendants to two years’ hard labor upon the public works of Richland county.
“A motion was made on behalf of said Kaigler for a new trial, upon the ground that the motion should have been heard by Judge Watts, whereas it was heard by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PopeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Boyles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Heiland v. HildebrandOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API