Legal Opinion

State v. Kendrick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2001PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted this appeal to determine whether the prosecution’s failure to elect the particular offense of aggravated rape upon which it sought to convict the defendant constituted plain error and required a new trial. The main purpose of the election requirement is to preserve a defendant’s right to a unanimous jury verdict under the Tennessee Constitution. A majority of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the defendant’s conviction for one count of aggravated rape without examining the election issue. After reviewing the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Burlison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. David E. Walton, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. STATE of Tennessee v. Courtney KNOWLESTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. STATE of Tennessee v. Courtney KNOWLESTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. STATE of Tennessee v. Courtney KNOWLESTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Tennessee v. Aaricka BileyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API