Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided April 3, 1919Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gusweiler,- J.

This cause is before the court upon an application of the plaintiff for a restraining order to enjoin the enforcement of Ordinance 253-1918 City of Cincinnati, by a challenge of the validity of said ordinance revising the fifty year franchise of The Cincinnati Street Railway Company. It is claimed that the City of *402Cincinnati had no authority to pass such an ordinance and that in various respects said ordinance is invalid.

The question as to what might be a fair, reasonable rate of passenger car fare charge is not in issue. Our sole matter of concern involves the validity of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Freeport Water Co. v. Freeport CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API