Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 18, 1955No. Reap. Dec. 8390; Entry No. A-4897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to merchandise that is described on the invoice as “Unik Doors No. 90- — - Stain Grade,” and which was exported by Canada Flushwood Door, Ltd., of Terrebonne, Quebec, and imported by the Concord Lumber Co., Inc., of Albany, N. Y. Entry was made at prices enumerated below. Appraisement was made at higher unit prices, which the appraiser regarded as foreign value, as such value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938. The entered and appraised values of the different…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glanson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Maher-App & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API