United States v. Mariela Zapata
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The appeal is from an adjudication of the appellant’s guilt of importation of 2000 grams of cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance, into the United States in violation of Title 21, U.S.C., § 952(a). The sole question presented for our review is whether the trial judge properly instructed the jury as to the intent nec essary to be proved to constitute guilt under § 952(a), and the accompanying penalty statute Title 21, U.S.C., § 960(a)(1). We reverse for what we consider the prejudicial deficiency of the jury instruction.
The appellant, Mariela Zapata; 1 arrived in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Lemuel MontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Montgomery Fly Cameron v. W. B. Hauck, Sheriff of Bexar County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Maria Lydia JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Simonne Marcelle ChristmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Francisco Restrepo-Granda, A/K/A Dario Toro GarcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. RevelesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Stephen Allan Lewis, A/K/A "Buddy"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Freddy Antonio ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Bolanle LawalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.