Scott v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentSawaya, J.
I concur in the majority decision to affirm the conviction. However, I do not agree with the new rule adopted by the majority that requires a criminal defendant to file a motion under rule 3.190(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in order to preserve the issue whether the State failed to present sufficient proof to qualify the Office of Statewide Prosecution (OSP) to prosecute the case. As to that part of the opinion, I respectfully dissent.
The OSP derives its authority to prosecute cases from article IV of the Florida Constitution and section 16.56, Florida Statutes. The OSP will have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McMillan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Castillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. PerkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- King v. First American Investigations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.