Reed v. State

GREEN, Judge.

Steven Reed appeals from the sentences imposed upon him in five separate cases following his entry of nolo contendere pleas to several burglaries and dealing in stolen property. He argues that, because the 1995 sentencing guidelines have been declared unconstitutional, he is entitled to resentencing under the 1994 guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Reed is partly correct. He is entitled to relief in the cases in which his offenses occurred within the period for challenging the statute,1 between October 1, 1995, and May 24, 1997, if the sentences in those…