Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Alexander & Fiden Machinery Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motions of defendant and third-party defendants for summary judgment. They met their initial burden, and plaintiff raised material issues of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant Colgate Plastics Corp., was injured while operating a drill press manufactured by third-party defendant Buffalo Forge Co. (Buffalo Forge) and sold to her employer by defendant. We reject the contention of defendant that, because it merely sold the used drill…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Stiles v. Batavia Atomic Horseshoes, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Otis v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horn v. Homier Distributing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API