Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided January 13, 2004No. 0143033PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, Judge.

Jesse Donald Richardson (appellant) appeals his conviction by a jury of aggravated sexual battery under Code § 18.2- 67.3. 1 At trial, appellant sought to attack the victim’s credibility by introducing evidence that the victim made prior false allegations of sexual assault. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in finding inadmissible evidence of alleged prior false allegations by the victim. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because appellant failed to provide a sufficient proffer to allow the trial court to make…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Blain v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  3. Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  4. Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  5. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roadcap v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  2. Brownlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. State v. David AldrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Jeffrey Scott Haas v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  5. Terry Lee Poff, s/k/a Terry Lee Poff, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API