Legal Opinion

Inman v. New York Interurban Water Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 22, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On demurrers to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

In order that we may appreciate the scope of this bill in equity, it is necessary to make a brief statement of the material facts alleged and of the relief demanded. Complainant is the owner of stock in the New York & Mt. Vernon Water Company, which, by consolidation,' in 1892, was merged in the defendant New York City Suburban Water Company. Said New York City Suburban Water Company mortgaged all its property to the defendant Atlantic Trust Company. Said Atlantic Trust Company brought an action of foreclosure in the Supreme Court of the state of New' York against the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Walker v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Cameron v. New York & Mount Vernon Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Drake v. New York Suburban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Drake v. New York Suburban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willcox v. Harriman Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  2. Empire Realty Co. v. HartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Bertelmann v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API