Legal Opinion
People v. Goodum
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 6, 2005No. 3-03-0003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry
The defendant, Donelmo Goodum, was charged with Class 4 felony retail theft (720 ILCS 5/16A — 3(a), 16A — 10(2) (West 2002)). His motion to suppress the evidence was denied. Following a stipulated bench trial, the court found the defendant guilty and sentenced him to 60 months of T.A.S.C. probation. On appeal, the defendant argues that the court erred by denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
In its indictment, the State charged the defendant with having committed retail theft on March 14, 2002. On June 11, 2002, the defendant filed a motion to quash the arrest and suppress the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The People v. Andrew R. BusheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. SurlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Warfield Ex Rel. Fox v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- In re Tyreke H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- People v. SurlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011