Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1922No. 13150PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. November 18, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Upon the trial of a criminal case it is not error for the judge to omit to charge upon a theory of defense raised solely by the defendant’s statement, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request; but where the judge on his own motion undertakes so to charge, his instructions must fully and correctly cover that theory. Reeves v. State, 114 Ga. 86 (39 S. E. 918); Richards v. State, 114 Ga. 834 (40 S. E. 1001); Smith v. State, 117 Ga. 259, 260 (43 S. E. 703); Ragland v. State, 111 Ga. 211 (36 S. E. 682); Phillips v. State, 11 Ga. App. 262 (75 S. E. 14).

2. Under the foregoing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ragland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Richards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API