Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Watt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 12, 1986No. 86-1013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiffs, both of whom are Republic Airlines (Republic) pilots, brought this action to enjoin the Chicago law firm of Cotton, Watt, Jones & King (Cotton Watt) from continuing to represent Northwest Orient Airlines (Northwest) pilots during the Airlines Pilots Association (ALPA) seniority list integration proceedings stemming from the merger of Northwest and Republic. Cotton Watt had formerly represented plaintiffs and other pilots, prior to their professional association with Republic, in similar seniority list integration proceedings and other matters allegedly related to their current…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,017 Carl R. Duncan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. INA Underwriters Insurance v. NalibotskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. La Salle National Bank v. Triumvera Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. McCormick v. Empire Accounts Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. CortelloniIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Musgrave v. FrenchIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Herbes v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Statler v. CatalanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. International Insurance v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API