Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GENERAL MOTORS CORP., FRIGIDAIRE DIV. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 16, 1957No. 55-56Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLittleton, Judge

Plaintiff sues to recover certain manufacturers’ excise taxes for the period January 1, 1945 through August 31, 1951, (1) attributable to a $5 charge which plaintiff made in the sale of each refrigerator for a warranty known as the Five Year Protection Plan, and (2) attributable to amounts expended in fulfilling its obligations under a one-year warranty for which no separate charge in any amount was made.

The Five Year ■ Protection Plan covered only the sealed unit of the refrigerator and its purchase was mandatory except to certain purchasers of multiple units. Plaintiff has two grounds on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Southern Maryland Agricultural Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API