Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co. v. Williams Equipment Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
The primary issue presented on appeal is whether defendant, Williams Equipment Sales, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Williams”), unlawfully retained possession of plaintiff Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co., Inc.’s (hereinafter referred to as “Superior”) 1956 Mack truck after repairing it, thus entitling plaintiff to damages for conversion. The trial court found that Williams converted the truck and awarded damages to Superior. Williams appeals.
This issue is presented in the backdrop of the following facts. Superior entered into a contract with Williams to pave Williams’ parking lot.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamilton v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Robinson v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Radley v. RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Bowden v. DuganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
- Wilson v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Janes v. Country Escrow ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982