Legal Opinion

Olivier v. Mt. Union Tanning & Extract Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1918No. 962Published

At Law. Action of replevin by Marcel Olivier, Maurice Rosier, and Daniel Brun, copartners doing business as Olivier & Co., against tire Mt. Union Tanning & Extract Company.

1Opinion of the Court

WITMER, District Judge.

This is an action of replevin brought by the plaintiffs, Marcel Olivier, Maurice Rosier, and Daniel Brun, copartners doing business under the ñrm name of Olivier & Co., against the Mt. Union Tanning & Extract Company, for the recovery of 1,576 tons of logwood in the yards and possession of the defendant at Mt. Union, Pa.

The case came on for trial, a jury having been called and sworn, and after proceeding with the trial and taking the. testimony of witnesses for plaintiff and some for defendant, upon agreement of counsel, the jury was dismissed, and the case proceeded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hart v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Century Throwing Co. v. MullerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  3. Strong, Deemer & Co. v. DinninySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Reinheimer v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  5. McFarland-Meade Co. v. DoakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API