State v. Killean
Arizona Supreme Court
1Dissent
ZLAKET, Vice Chief Justice,
dissenting.
I cannot subscribe to the majority opinion because it supports the unnecessary exclusion of important witnesses and exhibits in the absence of a showing that the defendant, whose liberty is at stake, had anything to do with their late disclosure. Where a defendant is innocent of the discovery violation and the trial court has other remedies available to it, I submit that the exclusion of evidence should generally be considered inappropriate.
Let us assume for argument’s sake that some tortured view of zealous advocacy prompted defense counsel to seek an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- McLaughlin v. FahringerArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Hyder v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980