Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Mutual Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 24, 1911No. 3,345PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. Action by Sarah A. Jackson against the Mutual Eife Insurance Company of New York. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit in five counts on five separate policies of insurance on the life of Don W. Jackson,: who died October 13, 1903. The defense was that the policies lapsed by the nonpayment of premiums of $13.30 bn each policy, which fell due July 8, 1903. By way of anticipating this defense the beneficiary, Sarah A. Jackson, plaintiff in error, in her amended and second amended petitions alleged:
“That prior to the date when the July 8, 1903, premium became due and payable by the terms of said policies, the said defendant company granted an extension of 60 days’ time to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hughes County v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- York v. WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walker v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
- Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. CostCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Atkinson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- Adams v. Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Larson v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.