Legal Opinion

Barber v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1943No. 4327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appellant, Frank Barber, by information, was charged with the offense of selling beer on Sunday, contrary to the provisions of Act No. 281 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1943.

By agreement, he was tried before the Court, sitting" as a jury, found guilty and a fine of fifty dollars was imposed. From the judgment comes this appeal.

The cause was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. The appellant says: “The question involved here is whether or not Senate Bill No. 43, which later became Act 281 of the Acts of 1943, passed the House of Representatives. ” <

From the stipulation of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Foster v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Dow v. BeidelmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  4. Road Improvement District No. 16 v. SaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Crowe v. Security Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Fletcher v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  4. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Fletcher v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API