Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sheehan v. Carvalho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1896Published

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by John 0. Sheehan against Solomon S. Carvalho and another. From an order denying plaintiff's motion to vacate an order for the examination of witnesses, he appeals.

1DissentVan Brunt, P. J.

I dissent from the conclusion at which the court has arrived in the case at bar. It is establishing a new practice which, so far as my observation goes, has never obtained, and which differs materially from that which has long prevailed under the Code in reference to motions respecting orders of arrest, orders of injunction, and warrants of attachment. In those cases, although the language of the Code is that an application to discharge such provisional remedies may be made, upon the papers or upon proof by. affidavits, by the defendants, it has uniformly been held that an application to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lovell v. MartinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API