Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Fox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1998No. 97-1425PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This case involves the issues of (1) whether a contract is usurious, and (2) assuming it is, whether the appellees, James Fox and Patricia Fox, are estopped from raising the usury claim. Because we are convinced that the proof clearly supports an estoppel defense, we reverse and remand.

On January 13, 1997, James Fox and Patricia Fox, who are husband and wife, filed an amended complaint for declaratory judgment against appellants Jack Bedford and Jack D. Bedford, Inc. The Foxes alleged that they entered into an agreement with Color Mate Photo, Inc., on March 18, 1992,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. City of Russellville v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Blanks v. American Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Estate of LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HutchersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Owners Ass'n of Foxcroft Woods, Inc. v. Foxglen AssociatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Evans v. HambySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. TallantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Cisco v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API