Legal Opinion

Claim of La Mendola v. Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Substantial evidence in the record supports the conclusion by the Workers’ Compensation Board that the excessive stresses claimant was under at work caused an underlying personality disorder to manifest itself, thereby disabling claimant, and that this was an accidental injury arising in the course of employment. Claimant testified that after purchasing a second debt-ridden insurance agency, he had to borrow heavily and use his personal funds to support the business. Claimant’s circumstances did not improve and he began having trouble coping; he was eventually diagnosed as having anxiety and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaliski v. Fairchild Republic Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Rackley v. County of RensselaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Kaliski v. Fairchild Republic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In re the Claim of Ottomanelli v. OttomanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Troy v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Claim of Marillo v. Cantalician Center for LearningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Claim of Smith v. Steuben County Highway DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API