Legal Opinion

Texas Refining Co. v. Sartain

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1918No. 8000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Hunt County; A. P. Dohoney, Judge. Action by George Sartain and another against the Texas Refining Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Appellees sued appellant for damages to their property and health alleged to have resulted from the operation of machinery connected with appellant’s cotton seed oil mill in buildings adjacent to the home of appellees. The machinery was alleged to consist of cotton and cotton seed conveyers, cotton gins, cotton seed crushers and ¡trailers, suction pipes, fans, and blowers used in cleaning cotton and cotton seed, the operation of wliicli, it was further alleged, produced loud and unusual noises, and discharged into the air quantities of dust, greasy lint, trash, offensive odors, and poisonous…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamoryTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Sherman Gas & Electric Co. v. BeldenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Davis v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGuffey v. Pierce-Fordyce Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API