Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Saffian v. Simmons

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2005No. Docket 250645Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partZahra, J.

This case presents two distinct issues: (1) Whether a medical malpractice defendant is relieved of the duty to timely answer or otherwise respond to a complaint where the complaint was filed with a defective affidavit of merit and (2) whether the trial court properly reinstated a default that the court had previously set aside. I agree with the majority that defendant was required to answer or otherwise timely respond to the complaint, notwithstanding the defective affidavit of merit. Although the affidavit of merit was defective under MCL 600.2912d, defendant did not have the authority to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API