Legal Opinion

City of New York v. National Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J. (dissenting):

Notwithstanding the hardship upon the city which once was assured by two bondsmen and now is left with none, I believe the well-founded surety law requires that this order should be reversed and, therefore, I dissent. The city sued the Brooklyn, Queens County and Suburban Railroad Company for the cost of repaving Jamaica avenue and recovered a judgment of $70,913.95 in November, 1912. The defendant railroad company appealed from the judgment and gave an undertaking on appeal by this defendant, the National Surety Company, which was in the usual form, to the effect that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Shutts v. . FingarNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. City of New York v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. City of New York v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API