(PS) Rhuma v. State of Libya
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAHER RHUMA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-02366 DAD AC PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STATE OF LIBYA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se, and the matter is accordingly before the 18 undersigned for pretrial proceedings pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). The complaint was 19 filed in late 2020, and defendant has never properly appeared. For the reasons set forth below, 20 the undersigned recommends that the case be dismissed as barred by res…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Trevino v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.