Legal Opinion

Starnes v. Judicial Retirement & Removal Commission

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

District Judge H. Randall Starnes appeals from an Order of the Judicial Retirement and Removal Commission removing him from office for the reasons stated in the “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Final Order” of the Commission.

*923Briefly stated, the Commission has found Judge Starnes guilty of “misconduct in office,” of “persistent failure to perform the duties of his office,” and “violating the Code of Judicial Conduct.”

The evidence, largely unrefuted, is that during much of his tenure, and more particularly during the last three years, Judge Starnes has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Judicial Retirement & Removal CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nicholson v. Judicial Retirement & Removal CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re District Judge KilburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Beth L. Maze v. Judicial Conduct CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Dawn M. Gentry v. Judicial Conduct CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Julia H. Gordon v. Judicial Conduct CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Julie Muth Goodman v. Jason Nemes, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the House of Representatives Impeachment CommitteeKentucky Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API