Legal Opinion
State v. Boggess
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions
cited Code (1868) c. 82, s. 12; 4 W. Ya. 745; 15 Graft. 664; 11 Graft. 819; 9 W. Ya. 559; Acts 1872-8, c. 99, s. 3; Acts 1877 c. 107; 18 W. Ya. 308; Hutchinson’s Treatise 1102. cited Code (1891) c. 32, s. 16; Hutch. Treat. 1102 form 646; 76 Mo. 56; Id. 322; 20 Mo. App. 641; 27 Kan. 499; 15 R. I. 529; 72 Wis. 7; 53 Ind. 162; 146 Mass. 146; Id. 203; 112 Ind. 245; 106 Ind. 319; 9 W. Ya. 559.
1Opinion of the Court
Beannon, Judge :
In February, 1890, in the Circuit Com’t of Monongalia couuty, the following indictment was found:
“State of West Virginia, Monongalia county, to wit: The grand jurors of the State of 'West Virginia, in and for the body of the county of Monongalia, upon their oaths present that A. M. Boggess, on the-day of Hovem-ber, in the year 1889, within one year next preceding the date of the finding of this indictment, in the said county, he, the said A. M. Boggess, having then and there a State license to sell spirituous liquors, wine, porter, ale, beer, and other intoxicating drinks, did…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crookham v. StateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1871
- State v. RiffeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
- Commonwealth v. HeadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
- State v. ChurchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pyles v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MastersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. PenningtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. ConstableWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.