United States v. Dillon
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge:
Percy Dillon appeals the District Court’s partial denial of his motion to reduce his sentence ’ pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In 2008, the United States Sentencing Commission amended the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”), retroactively reducing the base offense level for crack cocaine offenses. The District Court subsequently entered an order reducing Dillon’s sentence by two-levels, but held that it lacked authority to reduce Dillon’s sentence further. Dillon argues that the District Court erred in failing to recognize that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. DunphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MateoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. John MullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.