Emmons v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Freeborn county, where the action was tried before Farmer, J., and a verdict of $1,000 returned for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This case has already been twice before this court, (35 Minn. 503, 29 N. W. Rep. 202; and 38 Minn. 215, 36 N. W. Rep. 340,) and every question, except one, involved in the appeal was passed upon in the similar ease of Nelson v. Minn. &. St. Louis Ry. Co., supra, p. 131, (just decided.)
Upon the trial, expert witnesses were asked and permitted to answer the question, what, in their opinion, was the difference between the rental value of the farm with the railroad fenced and the -rental value with the railroad unfenced. Defendant assigns this as error, claiming that the proper mode of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weir v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Bryant v. LordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Emmons v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Emmons v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Leber v. Minneapolis & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schuler v. Board of SupervisorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Minnesota Belt Line Railway & Transfer Co. v. GluekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Haynes v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Ironton Land Co. v. ButchartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Mangold v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.