Griffith v. City of Trenton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J. Several
writs of certiorari involving the same question were, by consent of counsel, argued together. The writs bring up the orders appointing commissioners to condemn the lands of the prosecutors.
*24The contention of the prosecutors is that the city of Trenton is not invested with the power to condemn their lands by force of a statute, the title .of which is “An act to authorize cities of this state to purchase lands and erect suitable buildings for city purposes, and to sell lands and buildings now used for such purposes.” Pamph. L. 1903, p.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Falkner v. DorlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hutches v. Borough of HohokusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Clay v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- New York v. ParkerBurlington County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936
- Beers v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Cavalier Vending Corp. v. State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.