Legal Opinion

Doolan v. Heiser

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 10, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action of replevin for household goods, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County, Wolfe, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

The plaintiff claimed that the furniture sought to be replevied belonged to him and that he purchased it with his own money. The defendants claimed that they obtained title to the furniture in question by gift from the wife of the plaintiff, Minnie Doolan, now deceased. Mrs. Doolan was the daughter of one of the defendants and a sister of the other defendant. Minnie Doolan, during her lifetime, carried on business upon her own account and was a woman of means.

The defendants further claimed that Mrs. Doolan offered to purchase a house if the defendants would go and live in it; that the house…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Minor v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  2. Baxter v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. Camp's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  4. Guinan's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Monroe National Bank v. CatlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  2. Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. Fox v. ShanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Wladyka. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API