Suarez v. State

Juan Antonio Suarez raises four issues on this appeal from his convictions and sentences for burglary with an assault and robbery.

We find no merit to Suarez’s first assertion that the pretrial identification procedure employed by the police was unduly suggestive. Indeed, even if it had been, on this record, we conclude that it would not have given rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable mis-identification. See Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341, 343 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 1987, 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).

Next, we do not find that the trial court abused its discretion…