Legal Opinion

Francis v. Buttonwood Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 24, 2001No. 99-92-M.P., 99-95-M.PPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

The petitioners, Antonio Matos and Antonio Matos, L.L.C. (collectively, Matos) and Mount Hope Realty, L.L.C. (MtHope) sought our review of an interlocutory Superior Court order that rendered null and void the agreements for the sale of property between the petitioners and one of the respondents, 1 the receiver of Buttonwood Realty Co. (Buttonwood). The issues before us are (1) whether the petitioners’ requests that the receiver secure tax abatements prior to the sale of real estate constituted a “condition precedent” that the petitioners could not waive unilaterally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. Yates v. HillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. City of Providence v. S & J 351, INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. Onanian v. LeggatMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allan M. Shine v. Charles Moreau Charles D. Moreau v. Allan M. Shine Charles Moreau v. Allan M. ShineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020
  2. Woloohojian v. BogosianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API