Legal Opinion

Lane v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 29, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries arising out of a collision between a train operated by the defendant and a one-man electric trolley car operated by the plaintiff, as motorman, on a grade crossing in Worcester, on September 18, 1928. The declaration was in three counts, the first, for injury to the plaintiff arising out of the negligence of the defendant’s agents and servants, and the second, for injury by reason of the failure of those in charge of the defendant’s train to give the statutory signals as required by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 160, § 232. The third count was waived in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hicks v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Slattery v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. McDonald v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Brusseau v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Labrecque v. DonhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Verrocchi v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Rice v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API