Legal Opinion · Dissent

Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1986No. Nos. 3-44 through 3-49Published

1DissentMetzner, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the views of my colleagues expressed in the majority opinion.

The narrow issue on this appeal is whether DOE is compelled, as a matter of law, to issue the remaining entitlements notices. Resolution of this issue turns on the interpretation given Executive Order 12287 (Decontrol Order) effective January 28, 1981 (46 Fed.Reg. 9909, January 30, 1981), removing price and allocation controls on crude oil, and that given the expiration and savings clause of the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act (EPAA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 751-760h, as amended.

We are dealing here really with a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Massey Motors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API