Legal Opinion

Samuel Worthen v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided October 25, 2001No. 03-01-00019-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

Appellant Samuel Worthen was convicted as a party to the robbery at gunpoint of Patricia Contreras, the assistant manager of an Austin pawn shop. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 1994); see also id. § 7.02. It is undisputed that the robbery was committed by Jeff Lee. Worthen’s criminal responsibility for the crime was proved primarily through the testimony of two witnesses, Talia Thompson and Thomas Debrow. The district court instructed the jury that Thompson was an accomplice as a matter of law, but submitted the question of Debrow’s status as an accomplice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Theresa Garcia Infante v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  2. Castillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Charles, Robert Earl v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Howard Kenneth Dermody, II AKA Bear v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  5. Howard Kenneth Dermody, II AKA Bear v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API