Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Moore

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Schuyler Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

This is an action of replevin instituted in 1877 by Forrester, the defendant in error, to recover the possession of a portable saw mill of the alleged value of $1,000. Moore was the acting sheriff of Schuyler county, and as such had levied on this mill as the property of one ¥m. Buford, under several writs of ji. fa. issued on judgments in favor of different creditors against the partnership ' firm of Gray and others, of which Buford was a member!

Defendant’s answer tendered the general issue, except as to his possession, and then justified under the writs of execution, and averred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Ringo v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Slowey v. McMurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  5. Rothschild v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad v. St. Louis Union Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Jones v. RushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Bobb v. WolffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Morrow v. MatthewIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API