International Shoe Co. v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Van Sant, Commissioner
Reversing.
Appellant was indicted, convicted, and fined $100 and costs, for violating the provisions of KRS 118.340. A demurrer was filed to the indictment, whereupon, over the objection of appellant, the Commonwealth’s Attorney was permitted to amend the indictment. Section 126, Subsection 5, of the Criminal Code of Practice, provides: “The court may at any time cause the indictment to be amended in respect of any defect, imperfection or omission in the matter of form only.” This provision of the Code was enacted by the General Assembly in its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Going v. DinwiddieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Adams Express Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Mayo v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Commonwealth v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Lovings v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Baker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Baker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.