Legal Opinion

Wahl v. Seyfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the findings that the contract alleged in the complaint was made are contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (See Tracy v. Danzinger, 253 App. Div. 418; affd., 279 N. Y. 679.) (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to compel specific performance of an agreement.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tracy v. DanzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Tracy v. DanzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of BuehlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945