Legal Opinion

Breedlove v. Niagara Cold Drawn South

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 5, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Presiding Judge

(Eastern Section).

The pivotal issue on this appeal is, where an injured employee who has been paid workers’ compensation and subsequently recovers a judgment against a third party, the net proceeds of which exceed the employer’s subrogation claim, can a pro rata portion of the cost and attorney’s fees be charged against the subrogation claim? The answer is in the negative.

The salient facts are not in dispute. The Plaintiff-Appellee, Roy A. Breedlove, was *468injured while in the employ of the Inter-venor Appellant, Chattanooga Crane & Rigging Company (Crane) whose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. SchmidTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cross v. Pan Am World Services, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API