Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. v. Pharmachemie B.V.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentPauline Newman, Circuit Judge
My colleagues have peered deep into the recesses of patent examination, plucked out a routine and unreviewable administrative procedure — the “restriction requirement” for facilitating examination of complex cases — -and created a new standard of administrative review and a new ground of patent invalidity. I must, respectfully, dissent.
Whether or not the patent applicant here in suit was given proper or consistent restriction requirements by the various examiners, the issuance of these actions was entirely discretionary with the Commissioner. When the examiners accepted the applicant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.