Legal Opinion

Moore v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 1971No. Q-91Published

1Per curiam

The petitioner has filed in the Supreme Court of Florida his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which court issued its order to show cause, to which the respondent filed his return and later, pursuant to that court’s order, filed an amended return. The Supreme Court then entered an order transferring the cause to this court, in accordance with Rule 2.1, subd. a(5) (d), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., “for consideration of the sufficiency and merits of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed herein”..Pursuant to the said order of transfer, we have considered the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Herbert E. Rose v. E. B. Haskins, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Eason v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Johnson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Herbert Lee Cox v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API