Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ayers

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 30, 1993No. Record No. 0636-92-3PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELDER, J.

The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s vacation of Danny Ray Ayers’ habitual offender adjudication. It argues on appeal that the trial court erred in holding that North Carolina’s DUI statute, under which appellee was twice convicted, does not substantially conform to Code § 18.2-266, and could not be used as predicate offenses for an habitual offender adjudication in Virginia. For the reason's set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s vacation of the adjudication.

Appellee was declared an habitual offender under Virginia law on February 7, 1992, based on three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Shinault v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Cox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Kehl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael A. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. Wendell Kirk Dean v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  3. Curtis Lee Mason v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  4. Honaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API