Citizens Discount & Investment Co. v. Canatella
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
The defendant, Edward McCrossen, a member of the Fire Department of this city, was garnisheed and his salary impounded. He opposed the seizure of his wages upon the ground that he was a public officer and, as such, his salary exempt from seizure. There was judgment for defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff contends, first: That the failure to mention the salary of an officer among the exemptions from seizure set out in Act 184 of 1918 amending Article 644 of the Code of Practice has the effect of subjecting the salary of public officials to seizure, and second: That a fireman is not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1862
- Moll v. SbisaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Dunbar v. DinkgraveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
3Cited by2 opinions
- Foti v. Board of TrusteesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Industrial Discount Co. v. SchererLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928