Legal Opinion
Tasman v. Associated Hospital Service
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiles F. McDonald, J.
In the instant case the defendant issued to the plaintiff the usual hospital service contract of the Associated Hospital Service of Hew York with an effective date of June 29, 1957.
The policy provided in article III-(c): “For Pre-existing Conditions: Hospital service for any condition, disease or ailment which existed on the effective date of this contract or for which medical or surgical treatment or advice has been rendered within one year prior to such effective date, shall be available to a subscriber only after the first 11 months from the effective date of this contract.”
On December 3,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Taub v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Motorists Insurance v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Dirgo v. Associated Hospitals Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Society of New York Hospital v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. FoleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Mount Sinai Hospital v. ZorekCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.