Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

The facts out of which this litigation arises are as follows: In March, 1907, E. A. Watkins & Bros., defendants below, dealers in and manufacturers of lumber in the city of Norfolk, Va., owned, by purchase made in February, 1906, all of the standing timber within a certain boundary composed of two adjoining tracts of land, lying in the Dismal Swamp'section, Pasquotank county, N. C., known, respectively, as the Benj. Jones patent, containing 1,280 acres, and the Thomas Forehand patent, containing 535 acres; and during the month of March, 1907, negotiations were begun between George S. Briggs,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mowatt v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Fearon Lumber & Veneer Co. v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ware v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  2. Langman v. ALUMNI ASS'N OF U. OF VA.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  3. Langman v. Alumni Association of the UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Seaboard Ice Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  5. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API