Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Patel v. State
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 11, 2012No. 2011AP2861PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CURLEY, PJ.
¶ 1. Chintan V. Patel appeals the order of the trial court denying his petition for writ of coram nobis. Specifically, Patel argues that the trial *408court erred in denying his petition for writ of coram nobis because his petition stated two grounds that were properly within the writ's scope: (1) he did not knowingly plead guilty to the child enticement charge, and (2) the trial court did not determine that he required an interpreter at his plea hearing. We reject Patel's arguments and affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Patel, who was born in India in 1989 and who immigrated to the United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- In re ErnstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HadawayCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018