Legal Opinion

State v. Fisken

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 1996No. 930725M; CA A85503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The issue is whether the trial court erred in allowing testimony as to the numeric value of defendant’s blood alcohol level, as indicated by the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On May 8,1993, Oregon State Police Trooper Snook was patrolling Interstate 5 when he observed defendant’s vehicle drifting and weaving within its lane. The vehicle’s fluctuating speed and driving patterns led Snook to suspect that the driver of the vehicle was under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API